Most people who know the word Hügelkultur encountered it through the permaculture movement of the 2000s and 2010s. It gets described, loosely, as "a centuries-old technique" — which is both true and misleading. The technique is old. The documentation is not. And the full story of how this knowledge nearly disappeared — and why it was never widely translated — tells us something important about how agricultural knowledge actually moves through the world, and who benefits from it staying hidden.
At Koberwitz, in what is now Poland, the Austrian philosopher and esotericist Rudolf Steiner gave a series of eight lectures on agriculture that would eventually become the foundation of biodynamic farming. In one of those lectures, Steiner described what happens when decaying organic material is built into earthen mounds:
Steiner was not describing a gardening technique. He was describing a philosophy of soil — that dead material, given the right conditions, becomes alive again and passes that aliveness to the plants rooted above it. This idea would sit in the literature for nearly forty years before someone put it into practice in a garden.
A German gardener named Hermann Andrä noticed something in the corner of his grandmother's garden: a pile of woody debris — branches, logs, garden waste — that had been left to decompose on its own. Growing out of that pile was a diversity of plants unlike anything in the surrounding flat beds. Vigorous, healthy, self-sustaining.
Andrä understood what he was seeing. The rotting wood was acting as a sponge — holding moisture, releasing nutrients slowly, creating a microclimate of biological activity. He wrote a brochure about it. He called the method Hügelkultur — hill culture — and promoted it as an alternative to what he called "flatland culture." The brochure also served a practical purpose: burning woody garden debris was prohibited, and mound-building was a legal way to dispose of it.
That brochure — never officially translated into English — is the first time the word Hügelkultur appears in print. The entire modern practice traces back to one man looking at his grandmother's debris pile and understanding what it meant.
Another German gardener and follower of Rudolf Steiner, Hans Beba, collaborated with Andrä to revise and reprint the original brochure multiple times through the 1970s and 1980s. The book in the photograph above — Hügelkultur: die Gartenbaumethode der Zukunft (Hill Culture: the Garden Method of the Future) — is from this period. Published by Waerland-Verlag. It went through at least ten editions.
Those ten editions were printed in German. They were read by German-speaking gardeners in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. They were almost completely unknown in the English-speaking world. The knowledge existed. It was documented. It was in print. And it was inaccessible to most of the world because no one translated it.
In 1962 — the same year Andrä published his brochure — a 19-year-old Austrian named Sepp Holzer took over his family's farm in the Lungau region of the Salzburg Alps. The Krameterhof sits between 1,100 and 1,500 meters above sea level, on steep mountain slopes, in a climate that reaches -20°C in winter. The surrounding farms grew monocultural spruce plantations. The agricultural authorities considered the land marginal at best.
Holzer had other ideas. Over the following decades, he transformed the Krameterhof into what university professors would eventually certify as the most consistent example of permaculture in the world. He did it largely by reading nature — observing what thrived, where water moved, how microclimates formed around rocks and ponds — and working with those patterns rather than against them.
He was called The Rebel Farmer — because the authorities fined him repeatedly and threatened him with prison for methods that violated official agricultural regulations. Building ponds without liners. Not pruning trees the approved way. Growing what the experts said couldn't be grown at that altitude. He kept going anyway.
Steiner's 1924 Agriculture Course at Koberwitz laid the philosophical foundation for what would become biodynamic farming — a system that treats the farm as a living organism, with soil health as its central concern. His lecture on earthen mounds and decaying organic material planted the seed that Andrä would germinate nearly forty years later. Steiner also founded Waldorf education and the Anthroposophical Society.
Wikipedia ↗The man who named Hügelkultur. Andrä's observation of his grandmother's debris pile — the diversity of plants growing from decaying wood — led him to formalize and promote mound culture as a gardening method. His 1962 brochure is the first documented use of the term. He was a follower of Rudolf Steiner and the Waerland health movement, and his work was deeply rooted in the biodynamic tradition. Almost nothing is written about him in English — a fact that says more about the publishing industry than about the importance of his contribution.
Beba collaborated with Andrä to revise and expand the Hügelkultur brochure through multiple editions. His revisions kept the knowledge alive through the 1970s and 80s. Like Andrä, he was a follower of Steiner and worked within the biodynamic tradition. The book in the photograph above — Hügelkultur: die Gartenbaumethode der Zukunft — is their collaboration. It went through at least ten editions in German and was never translated into English.
The man who proved it at scale. Holzer took over his family's Krameterhof farm at age 19 and spent the next sixty years transforming it into a 110-acre permaculture showcase at 1,500 meters elevation — complete with 72 ponds, 70 species of fish, lemons, kiwis, and oranges growing in the Austrian Alps, and an operation run by two people. He was fined and threatened with prison for his methods. He consulted internationally — Portugal, Spain, Ukraine, Russia, Montana — helping stop desertification using water retention and natural patterns alone. Now 78 and still teaching at his new farm, the Holzerhof.
Official site ↗ · Wikipedia ↗ · Krameterhof ↗The Krameterhof · By the Numbers
- Elevation: 1,100–1,500 meters above sea level
- Size: 110 acres (45 hectares)
- Ponds: 72 — fed by mountain springs, gravity managed
- Winter temperature: Down to -20°C
- Staff: Two people — Sepp and his wife Vroni
- Crops grown: Lemons, kiwis, oranges, over 30 fish species, crayfish, orchids, heritage grains, vegetables, fruit trees
- Chemical inputs: Zero
- Fertilizer: None — pigs do the plowing and fertilizing
The core of Holzer's method is microclimate creation. Every pond reflects sunlight, warming the surrounding banks. Every rock outcrop creates a shelter zone on its south-facing side. Every Hugelkultur mound holds moisture that would otherwise run off the steep slopes. By stacking these small interventions across 110 acres, Holzer created an environment where the average hardiness zone effectively shifted two full zones upward — making citrus fruit possible in conditions where the neighboring farms could only grow spruce.
His pigs are not livestock — they are tools. Throw corn on the spot where you want a new bed. The pigs dig, root, and fertilize it over several days. Bring them back to their enclosure and plant. No tractor. No diesel. No compaction.
The authorities came for him repeatedly. Building ponds without liners violated regulations. Not pruning trees the approved way violated regulations. Growing exotic crops at altitude violated the received wisdom of the agricultural extension system. Holzer refused to comply. The farm kept producing. Eventually the fines stopped and the consultancy invitations started — from governments, universities, and private landowners around the world who had heard what was happening on the Schwarzenberg mountain.
The suppression was not always deliberate. Some of it was simply the structure of the agricultural knowledge system. Universities train agronomists in industrial methods because that is where the research funding comes from. Extension programs teach chemical inputs because that is what the suppliers support. Academic journals publish studies on yield optimization for monocultures because that is what commodity agriculture needs to know.
Andrä's brochure was printed in German. Beba's revisions were printed in German. Holzer's early books were in German. The knowledge existed, was documented, and went through ten editions — in a language that the English-speaking agricultural world was not reading.
The internet changed this. The permaculture community discovered Holzer in the early 2000s. His books were translated. YouTube documented the Krameterhof. The word Hügelkultur entered the English-speaking gardening vocabulary — often stripped of its origins, often described as "ancient" or "traditional" in ways that erased the specific people who developed and preserved it.
Further Reading & Viewing
- Sepp Holzer Official Website ↗ — his current farm, seminars, books
- Krameterhof ↗ — now run by his son Josef, tours and seminars available
- Sepp Holzer — Wikipedia ↗
- Holzer Permaculture — Wikipedia ↗
- Sepp Holzer — YouTube documentaries ↗
- Hügelkultur explained — YouTube ↗
- Hügelkultur: What Is It and Should It Be Used in Home Gardens? — ResearchGate 2021 ↗ — the academic paper that documents Andrä's 1962 brochure as the origin
- Sepp Holzer's Permaculture — book, available from major booksellers
- The Rebel Farmer — book, Sepp Holzer's autobiography
- Desert or Paradise? — DVD/YouTube, documents Holzer's international restoration work
This article is part of The Philosophy section of Jamie's Garden 2026 — a documentation of the ideas behind a container permaculture system at 1,170 feet in the Santa Monica Mountains.